Mweelra
Townland in the civil parish of Conry, barony of Rathconrath, Co. Westmeath
Parcel 96764
- Area
- 351,877 m² (35.19 ha, 86.95 acres)
- Buildings
- 1 building touches it, 234 m² on the ground
- Zoning
- No zone of a development plan covers it in the national zoning. Outside zoned towns and villages, the county development plan's rural policies apply.
- Townland
- Mweelra
Planning applications on this parcel
21 Dec 2021Conditional
The construction of a 5.0m wide x 2.1 wide (internal dimensions) with 300mm walls x 16m long precast concrete underpass under the R-390 road to connect our lands and all associated pathways at Rathnew & Lalistown, Loughnvalley, Mullingar, Co Westmeath.
Permission · Westmeath County Council, 21681
Source: National Planning Applications, Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage, CC BY 4.0. Applicants are not shown.
Designated sites
No designated site (Special Area of Conservation, Special Protection Area, Natural Heritage Area or proposed one) touches this parcel.
Recorded monuments around it
This parcel is in the zone of notification of 46 recorded monuments.
- WM024-025 Barrow - unclassified
Description
Surveyed in 2013 and described by McGuinness (2014, 62-3) as following: 'Enormous subcircular mound (35m N-S x 30m E-W) reaching up to 4.4m in height on NE side, with sharply defined edge marked by a clear step or scarp. Traces of a shallow ditch are visible immediately beyond the step, running clockwise from S to N or NE; where clearest at NW, this is up to 1.5m in width, which would give an overall diameter for of 38m N-S. In SE quadrant, domed summit slopes down fairly uniformly to edge of mound, but elsewhere, the slope lessens from highest part towards edge of mound, giving the impression of a kind of berm. Numerous limestone boulders and outcrops of rock are visible over surface of mound, especially in NE quadrant and along part of perimeter. Old deciduous trees, located just inside the perimeter of the mound, were clearly planted, probably as shelter for cattle; a few others farther in towards the centre appear younger in date and presumably result from natural seed-dispersal. Clear traces of a dry-walled revetment to the stepped edge of the mound on SW, S and E sides may relate to the same episode of landscaping that involved the planting of trees; the step is best preserved where the walling has survived, reaching up to 0.84m in height. Macalister and Praeger ‘examined’ the mound ‘with no satisfactory results’. They had taken it ‘for a mound of stones, possibly a large artificial carn’, but it ‘proved to be a mere outcrop of much decomposed rock’. Their ‘examination’ presumably involved some kind of excavation but no record of this has been left. Their dismissal of the site as ‘a mere outcrop’ is completely inconsistent with its current appearance, that of an artificially shaped mound, although substantial areas of outcrop were clearly incorporated into it by its builders; its location in immediate proximity to a large ringfort-like structure (WM024-027----) is also consistent with an artificial origin. Presumably with similar reservations about Macalister and Praeger’s conclusions, Schot (2006) marks it as a ‘Barrow/mound’ on her map of the Uisneach complex. Monument lies on a low eminence just 8m to NNW of the large and complex bivallate ringfort excavated by Macalister and Praeger (1929-31); prehistoric rock art reused in this fort (O’Reilly 2010) was conceivably taken from the barrow. At least one other ringfort (WM024-027----) lies close by to W'. Compiled by: Caimin O'Brien based on details provided by David McGuinness. Date of upload: 23 February 2015
- WM024-027 Ringfort - rath
Description
Situated on a terrace, on N-facing slope of a hill, in pasture, with excellent views to W and N. Annotated ‘Rathfarsan’ and depicted on the revised 1913 ed. OS 25-inch map as an oval-shaped earthwork. Bivallate ringfort described in 1971 and 1976 as an oval-shaped area (dims. 47.60m NE-SW and 35.50m NW-SE) enclosed by an earth and stone bank, an intervening fosse and an outer bank. The inner and outer banks are substantial and the intervening U-shaped fosse is wide and deep (D 3m). The inner bank has several small disturbance gaps. The outer face of the inner bank has been steepened and partly stone faced from NE-E-SSE to form part of a modern field fence. The fosse has been modified from NE-E-SSE and the outer bank has been removed at this point. The outer bank is slightly disturbed in several places and has several small gaps. The original entrance is not recognisable. A rectangular-shaped house site (WM024-027001-) is visible in S quadrant. A low rise or platform is located to N of the house site and a second low rise is visible in the NW-quadrant. Compiled by Alison McQueen, Vera Rahilly and Caimin O’Brien. Date of upload: 31 July 2019
- WM024-027001 House - indeterminate date
Description
Situated on a terrace, on N-facing slope of a hill, in pasture, with excellent views to W and N. In the S quadrant of the interior of a ringfort (WM024-027----) are the remains of a rectangular-shaped house site (dims. 5m NE-SW; 4m NW-SE) defined by a slight earthen bank (overall Wth 1.4m; Wth at top 0.4m; H 0.25m) with a gap (Wth 3.3m) in the S side, at the SW corner, which may represent a doorway. A low rise or platform is located to N of the house site and a second low rise is visible within the NW-quadrant of the ringfort. Compiled by Alison McQueen, Vera Rahilly and Caimin O’Brien. Date of upload: 31 July 2019
- WM024-028 Ringfort - cashel
Description
Situated on NNE facing slope of Ushnagh Hill with barrow (WM024-025----) immediately to N, moated site (WM024-029----) 110m to E and Rathfarson (WM024-027----) 150m to W. The townland boundary with Ushnagh Hill lies immediately to S. This monument was excavated between 1929-30 by Macalister and Praeger and during the excavations they uncovered a spiral-decorated stone (WM024-028001-) which formed part of the pavement in the middle of Court A (Macalister and Praeger 1929-31, 77), a house site (WM024-028002-) and two souterrains (WM024-028003-/004-). Prior to excavation the monument was described as following; 'The structure consists of the following parts: 1. The Outer Fosse, now almost completely filled, and represented by a shallow depression in the ground, running round the entire site, but most clearly traceable to the north-west and the east. 2. The Outer Vallum, much abraded. 3. The Outer Area, divided irregularly by cross walls radiating like the spokes of a wheel (here called the Radial Walls). 4. The Inner Fosse, resembling the Outer Fosse, and, like it, almost completely filled. 5. The Inner Vallum, in much better condition than the Outer Vallum, and enclosing 6. The Inner Area, raised to a height of about 5 ft. [1.5m], above the level of the surrounding country, on the southern and western sides. This area displayed a number of irregularities of surface, evidently due to the presence of the buried foundations of walls. These were so vague that, before excavation, no satisfactory plan could have been made of them' (Macalister and Praeger 1929-31, 55). Excavation of the outer fosse revealed that the ditch was 'found it to be uniform in character throughout, though the dimensions varied slightly from place to place. The breadth at the surface ranged from 9 ft. [2.7m] to 11 ft. 6 ins. [3.5m]: the depth from 6 ft. 10 ins. [2.08m] to 8 ft. [2.4m]. The sides slope inward; the breadth at the bottom was about 2 ft. 6 ins [0.76m]' (ibid.). The outer vallum was described as 'essentially composed of the earth taken out of the fosse which runs alongside of it; there is no indication that any of this material was cast up on the outer side of the fosse. Stones are mingled with the earth; these were probably embedded in the drift material extracted from the fosse. The outer face of the vallum seems to have been revetted with stones above the level of the filling of the fosse and therefore after the fosse had been filled up. Most of this revetment has however been removed by builders of field-walls and the like constructions, in search of stones. A few cow-bones were found in the earth of the vallum, underneath the stone revetment. The vallum was best preserved on the northern side, where it rose to a maximum height of 5 ft. 6 ins. [1.67m] outside, and 2 ft. [0.6m] inside. To the E. and S. it was much injured- indeed, between about the N.N.E. and the E. points it had absolutely disappeared, and even excavation failed to reveal the slightest trace of it' (ibid.). The area between the two enclosing banks was described by Macalister and Praeger as; 'Between the two ramparts there is a flat annular area, ranging in breadth between 40 and 58 feet [12-15m]. On the N. and W. sides the area was divided into sections by the Radial Walls. This First Radial Wall is 52 feet [16m] long and 3 ft. 6 ins. [1m] broad. In its present form it rises about 2 feet [0.6m] above the level of the ground' (ibid). The inner fosse and bank was described as 'similar in section to the Outer Fosse, but is of smaller size. So far as we tested it, the depth is nowhere over 6 ft. [1.8m]; the breadth at top ranges between 7 ft. 6 ins. [2.3m] and 9 ft. [2.7m], except at the entrance cause way, where it is as much as 11 ft. [3.35m]. The inner face of the fosse is covered with a revetment, extending from the top of the Inner Vallum to the bottom of the ditch, and evidently original. The Inner Vallum, though much better preserved than the Outer Vallum, is not in good condition; when we saw it first we counted seven breaches, any or all of which might have been original entrances. Sections across the wall shewed that it was fundamentally of earth, with a sloping stone revetment on the outer face, and a well-built vertical revetment on the inner. The outer revetment was also well built, on the whole. It ran down the face of the wall to the bottom of the fosse outside it, and therefore must have been built while the fosse was still open. The maximum height of the revetment above the bottom of the fosse is 8 feet [2.4m]; how much higher it may have been when complete there is nothing to shew, but it is not likely to have been less than 15 or 16 feet [4.8m] high in all. On the inner side the vallum nowhere rose to more than 2 ft. [0.6m] above the level of the enclosed area. From summit to summit the diameter of the ring of the vallum is about 110ft [33.5m]' (ibid.). The causewayed entrance at NE was described as a 'causeway, which is merely the length of the fosse left uncut, and lined with a stone facing on each of its vertical sides. Externally this causeway is 27 ft. 5 ins. [8.3m] in breadth; internally it is a little less, as the sides taper to some extent. There is no indication of a pavement, or of a protecting wall along the edges; nor yet of a gateway of any kind at the entrance to the causeway'. The inner causewayed entrance was described as 'a similar causeway, 21 feet [6.4m] across. This causeway rises to the entrance through the Inner Vallum by a rather steep slope. As the visitor enters, his left-hand side is flanked by the Fourth Radial Wall. This must have been a structure of great and imposing massive ness. The remains indicated a thickness of no less than 7 ft. 8 ins [2.3m]. The wall, or rather its much disturbed ruin, runs for a length of 27 feet [8.2m]; it was probably longer in its original state. On the visitor's right hand there is nothing but the facing of the causeway, 2 ft. [0.6m] to 2 ft. 6 ins. [0.76m] across, which may possibly have risen above the surface to form a protecting wall over the edge of the fosse. The passage through the Inner Vallum, to which these causeways give access, is 8 ft. [2.4m] in breadth, and is paved, especially on the southern side, with sandstone flags. The sides of the entrance are composed of masonry jambs, of which only the bottom course remains, to a height of about 1 foot [0.3m]; the building on the southern side is rather more perfect and regular than on the northern side. Here the line of the jamb is prolonged and curves round in a single row of stones 2 ft. [0.6m] thick, to form what appears to be a sort of sentry-box, semicircular on plan, and 3 ft. 2 ins. [0.96m] in maximum diameter (internally)'. The inner courtyard area of the ringfort was described by the excavators as consisting of a 'Central Court triangular in shape. The south-eastern side is formed by the vallum; the western and northern sides by walls, now ruined to their foundations, and so much despoiled that their outline is not a little indefinite. The northern wall is not straight, but runs in a curved line, concave to the court. The court measures 52 ft. [15.85m] east to west, 68 ft. [20.7m] north to south; the sunk area measures about 30 ft. [9.1m] north to south. The floor of the court, on the northern side of the sunk area, is paved with flags of sandstone. No pavement remains on the southern side, or in the sunk area, except near the entrance, where there is a poor pavement, chiefly of limestone. The wall forming the northern boundary of the Central Court has three doorways, which give access to two courts between it and the site of the vallum (which is here destroyed on its inner face). Two of these doorways lead into the eastern court (A), the third into the western. The walls surrounding these courts were roughly built from the first, and the spoilers have left them in so complete a state of ruin that they are difficult to trace. The maximum
- WM024-028001 Rock art
Description
This stone was found by Macalister and Praeger (1929-31) in the course of their excavations of a ringfort (WM024-028----). It is now housed in the National Museum of Ireland (DU018-407----). This stone has been described by O’Reilly (2010, 76-7) as follows: ‘Macalister and Praeger's report on their excavations at Togherstown on the northern slopes of the Hill of Uisneach was published in 1931. Included in the excavation report was a drawing and description of a small fragment of a stone decorated with prehistoric rock art that had been re-used as a paving slab in the courtyard of the early medieval ringfort. . . . The Togherslown stone is a fragment of local sandstone measuring approximately 38 x 36 x 10cm that seems to have been broken off a larger stone in the vicinity at some stage before being deposited at Togherstown. The excavators believed it to have been decorated on three surfaces, and recorded that it was 'inscribed on both faces and one edge (presumably the original top) with bronze-age spiral ornament. The side which had been turned uppermost in the pavement where it was found was abraded by footwear: but the lower side was, if anything, rather more injured by weathering, except along one edge where the surface was bevelled and preserved its carving quite sharp'. The ornament on the uppermost face and the bevelled edge is indeed clear, but that on the third face is less convincing. When examined and photographed in 2001 this surface still had red chalk lines drawn on it. These correspond to Macalister's supposed spirals, which are indicated only very faintly on his original drawing. On closer inspection it appears that this is a naturally weathered and pitted surface and that these 'spirals' must be ruled out as rock art. Of the two remaining surfaces the ornament on the 'bevelled edge' is the best preserved, having being laid face-down in the paved courtyard. On this surface two motifs can be seen. The first is a small cup-mark approximately 3cm in diameter surrounded by two concentric rings, the largest measuring approximately 8cm in diameter. Immediately beside it are the remains of a similar but larger pattern, apparently another cup-and-ring design. Of this pattern only two arcs of the outer rings are visible, the rest of the motif being truncated by the broken edge of the stone. The second side of the Togherstown stone is badly worn as a result of being exposed when used as a paving stone. This surface does, however, contain the larger portion of rock art on the stone. It consists of a central cup-mark approximately 3cm in diameter surrounded by five concentric arcs, the largest of which has a diameter of 20cm. When complete, the arcs must have formed a group of concentric rings around the central cup-mark.’ See attached images of rock art and its location in the N quadrant of the ringfort taken from Macalister and Praeger 1929-31. Compiled by: Paul Walsh Date of upload: 30 August 2013
- WM024-028002 House - indeterminate date
Description
Situated on a terrace, on NNE-facing slope of Ushnagh Hill, in pasture, with excellent views to W, N and E. In W quadrant of ringfort (WM024-028----) are the remains of a rectangular-shaped house site defined by well-preserved stone built walls and with an entrance in the N side. A souterrain (WM024-028003-) is located within this structure. House site excavated in 1929-30 (Macalister and Praeger 1929-31). Compiled by Alison McQueen, Vera Rahilly and Caimin O’Brien. Date of upload: 12 August 2019
- WM024-028003 Souterrain
Description
Situated on a terrace, on NNE-facing slope of Ushnagh Hill, in pasture, with excellent views to W, N and E. In W quadrant of ringfort (WM024-028----) are the remains of a rectangular-shaped house site (WM024-028002-) with a souterrain (WM024-028003-) located within this structure. House site and souterrain excavated in 1929-30 (Macalister and Praeger 1929-31). Listed by the excavators as the 'Greater Souterrain' which was described as following; 'Returning to the western court north of the Central Court, we enter at a doorway in its western wall. This doorway has two jamb-stones, 2 ft. 3 ins. [0.68m] apart, 2 ft. 2 ins. [0.66m] high, and 2 ft. [0.6m] broad. In the opening between them, there are two paving-flags, with a third behind them at a slightly lower level, forming a step downward. Behind this again there is another flagstone at the western side of the passage, forming a further step down ward 1 ft. 2 ins. [0.35m] deep. This doorway gives admission to a chamber, 12 ft. 4 ins. [3.75m] in length, and 4 ft. 2 ins. [1.27m] in maximum breadth. The height was at least 4 ft. 10 ins. [1.5m], but the roofing-flags are all gone. These must have formed a pavement for the triangular court overhead. The floor slopes downward by about 2 feet [0.6m] in its course. The chamber at Togherstown ends in a doorway 1 ft. 2 ins. [0.35m] across, which gives access to a further chamber, B; a drop of 9 inches [0.22m] leads from the threshold of the doorway to the floor. This second chamber is kidney-shaped on plan, 19 ft. 6 ins. [6m] long, 6 ft. 10 ins. in maximum breadth. Three of the roofing-flags remain, giving a clear height of 5 ft. 6 ins. [2m] above the floor in the middle of the chamber - rather more at the end. The floor is very neatly paved with sandstone flags which, though irregular in shape, are well fitted into one another, producing an effect which resembles the "crazy pavements'' of artistic gardens. At the southern end of the chamber there is a cupboard-like recess just under the roof. It is 3 ft. 9 ins. [1.14m] above the floor, 3 ft. [0.9m] across, 2 ft. 6 ins. [0.76m] high, and is built all round with stones. The floor of this cupboard consists of two flat flagstones, with a row of five stones along the outer edge forming a kind of high sill. The roof of the cupboard is formed by a great stone, 5 ft. [1.5m] long, 2 ft. [0.6m] across, 1 ft. [0.3m] thick, kept in position by smaller stones wedged into the earth at each end. From the back of the cupboard there runs a narrow ventilating shaft, 7 ft. 6 ins. [2.28m] long, formed of small stones close together, supporting small cover-slabs. At the N.E. corner of the chamber there is what may be described as a kind of portico (C), badly built, 4 ft. 8 ins. [1.42m] in length by 4 ft. 6 ins. [1.37m] wide; it was at least 5 ft. 5 ins. [1.65m] high. It steps down into the creep-passage (D) which follows, behind an irregularly shaped sill-stone which is flush with the ground on the outer side, but on the inner rises 10 ins. [0.25m] above the floor. The creep-passage runs eastward from the portico. It is 7 ft. [2.1m] in length, 1 ft. 10 ins. [0.55m] across, 3 ft. 7 ins. [1.09m] high. It is awkward to pass through, and is rendered still more so by a sill of two stories set on edge, end to end, crossing the floor. This sill is 9 ins. [0.22m] high and 9 ins. [0.22m] broad, and is set at 3 feet [0.9m] from the inner end of the passage. On this sill we find conspicuous marks of wear, such as we also find at various places further in. The passage ends in a step downward, 1 ft. [0.3m] deep, leading into the next chamber, E. This is oval on plan, 10 ft. 7 ins. [3.2m] long and 5 ft. 7 ins. [1.7m] in maximum breadth. Only two of the roofing-lintels remained in position, giving a height of 5 ft. 1 in. [1.55m]. Two other lintels had fallen into the chamber, which was full of earth that had run into the opening thus made. In this earth filling was discovered part of an Anglo-Saxon saucer-brooch -the first of its kind to be found in Ireland - which was not only remarkable in itself, but gave a welcome, if insecure, hint at a date. The brooch dates from the sixth century A.D., which possibly may approximate to the date when the lintels collapsed. The floor of this chamber is irregular. To the south of the entrance doorway there is a kidney-shaped hollow sunk in the drift, 2 ft. 4 ins. [0.7m] across and about 1 ft. [0.3m] deep. It was nearly filled with a block of stone that lay within it. Both the entrance and the exit doorways are of an awkwardly small size. The first is of the dimensions of the passage that leads to it. The second is 3 feet [0.9m] high, 2 ft. 11 ins. [0.88m] across, and 2 ft. [0.6m] in length, with large blocks of stone serving as jambs. stones on which such marks of traffic would naturally be looked for. The exit doorway admits us into a short passage, F, the axis of which is at right angles to that of the chamber just left. At its western end there is a manhole, opening in the floor of the Post-hole Court just beside the post-holes. The floor under the manhole is 5 ft. [1.5m] beneath the surface of the ground. The breadth of the manhole is 2 ft. 11 ins. [0.88m] to the edge of the first lintel. This is a passage, G, approximately continuing the line of the fallen-in chamber, averaging about 3 ft. [0.9m] in breadth. The height is 4 ft. 8 ins. [1.42m], which reduces to 3 ft. [0.9m] near the inner end. From doorway to doorway the length is 11 ft. 9 ins. [3.58m] Just before reaching the exit doorway, the floor drops suddenly over a large block of stone to a depth 3 ft. [0.9m] below its previous level. The roofing-stones of this part of the souterrain are of considerable size. Immediately before the drop in the floor, there is an opening in the eastern wall, formed by the omission of one stone. Below it there is a projecting sill, shewing that the construction was intentional; apparently the purpose was to make a small cupboard, possibly for holding a lamp to illuminate this dangerous part of the cave. The exit doorway is 3 ft. 10 ins. [1.16m] high, 3 ft. [0.9m] across, and 2 ft. [0.6m] from front to back. The lintel is thus only slightly above the floor-level of this part of the passage leading to it. It gives access to a continuation of the passage, turned approximately at right angles to the line of the first portion. In the corner opposite we found a small pile of loose stones, but it concealed nothing. This part of the souterrain (H) is 14 ft. 9 ins. [4.5m] long and, at the outer end, 3 ft. 6 ins. [1.06m] broad and 5 ft. 6 ins. [1.67m] high. At the inner end the breadth is just over 3 ft. [0.9m] and the height 5 ft. 4 ins. [1.62m]. About the middle the breadth taken across the floor is 4 ft. 4 ins. [1.32m]; about 4 ft. [1.2m] above the floor the side walls, which approximate from the foundations, are shouldered out on the principle of the cantilever, and the clear breadth of the roof is not more than 1 ft. 5 ins. [0.43m]. Finally the passage turns once more through an angle, and runs for a length, K, of 11 ft. 6 ins. [3.6m]. At the angle, on the convex side, there is the opening of a second airshaft 3 ft. 6 ins. [1.06m] above ground, 9 ins. [0.22m] high, 1 ft. 3 ins. [0.38m] across; it runs for a length of 13 ft. [3.96m] to its outer exit. The passage ends abruptly at the inner end of this last section; the end is 4 ft. [1.2m] broad and slightly concave; the height above the floor is 5 ft. 7 ins. [1.7m]' (Macalister and Praeger 1929-31, 71-4). See attached plan of the souterrain taken from Macalister and Praeger 1929-31. Compiled by Alison McQueen, Vera Rahilly and Caimin O’Brien. Date of upload: 12 August 2019
- WM024-028004 Souterrain
Description
Situated on a terrace, on NNE-facing slope of Ushnagh Hill, in pasture, with excellent views to W, N and E. In W quadrant of ringfort (WM024-028----) are the remains of a rectangular-shaped house site (WM024-028002-) with a souterrain (WM024-028003-) located within this structure and a second souterrain excavated in 1929-30 (Macalister and Praeger 1929-31, 75-6). Listed by the excavators as the 'Lesser Souterrain' which was described as following; 'The lesser souterrain lies to the south of the souterrain [WM024-028003-] just described, and is entirely independent of it. The entrance is apparently at an almost megalithic trilithon, or at least a structure of which one side was formed by a large rounded boulder, apparently pressed into the service because it was too heavy to move; which stood on the southern side of the Inner Fosse, a little to the south of its outer edge. The space between the supports was about 2 feet [0.6m] wide and the same high; the lintel stone, which was partly displaced, measured 4 ft. [1.2m] by 2 ft. 5 ins. [0.73m] by 1 ft. [0.3m], and the supporting stone was of about the same order of magnitude. In and around this structure there were traces of large fires. This entrance gives access to an oval chamber, A, 17 ft, 2 ins. [5.2m] long and 5 ft. 2 ins. [1.57m] broad; the walls remain standing to a height of 4 ft. 6 ins. [1.37m]. This chamber runs through the inner fosse, and in order to build it the fosse must have been filled up to a depth of 3 feet [0.9m]. The fosse is here rather wider than usual - 8 ft. 7 ins. [2.6m] - and we reach its inner edge at about 1 foot [0.3m] before reaching the exit doorway of the chamber. At the exit doorway there is a neatly built sill of three stones, about 5 feet [1.5m] below the present surface of the ground. The exit of the chamber leads into a passage, B, 16 feet [4.87m] in length. This contracts to a narrow opening at 6 ft. [1.8m] from the entrance. Near the end, the passage contracts again to a width of 2 ft. 8 ins. [0.81m], where there are two jamb-stones, the one on the north about 2 feet [0.6m] cube, the other on the south 3 ft. [0.9m] high by 2 ft. 6 ins. [0.76m] by 2 ft. [0.6m]. At 3 feet [0.9m] from this point, and 33 ft. 2 ins. [10.1m] from the megalithic entrance, there is a doorway 1 ft. 8 ins. [0.5m] high by 1 ft. 10 ins. [0.55m] broad, with a sill rising 6 ins. [0.15m] high on the inner side. This doorway admits to those portions of the souterrain which are within the Inner Area. A passage, C, runs inward from it for a length of 16 ft [4.87m], 4 ft. 6 ins. [1.37m] high and a little over 3 ft. [0.9m] broad. It is very badly and irregularly constructed. The passage runs for the distance specified in a N.E. direction, and then turns through approximately a right angle. The second stretch of the passage, D, is 29 ft. [8.83m] in length. Owing to irregularities, fallen stones, and the low roof, it is troublesome to explore. The only feature of interest is a small cupboard-recess, E, on one side, about half way along its course. The passage ends in a blank wall; but on each side there is an entrance giving admission to a chamber. These chambers are the only passably good constructions in the souterrain. The left-hand doorway is 2 ft. 2 ins. [0.66m] high and 2 ft. [0.6m] broad, and is 3 ft. [0.9m] from front to back. The chamber, F, to which it leads is shapely, and built of fairly large stones; it is 14 ft. 6 ins. [4.4m] long and 5 ft [1.5m] in maximum breadth. At the inner end is a recess 1 ft. 8 ins. broad and 1 ft. 8 ins. [0.5m] high, and penetrating 2 ft. [0.6m] into the wall. It had no masonry back, and we found it convenient to cut through the clay behind it, thus making a second opening by which the chamber could be most easily entered. The opposite doorway on the right-hand side of the passage is smaller, and more difficult to pass through. It leads into a similar but smaller chamber, G. Both chambers, as usual, are roofed with large flag-stones'. See attached plan of the souterrain taken from Macalister and Praeger 1929-31. Compiled by: Caimin O'Brien Date of upload: 12 August 2019
- WM024-029 Moated site
Description
Situated on N facing slope of rising ground with ringfort (WM024-028----) 125m to W. A report from 1971 records that the monument consisted of ‘a large rectilinear enclosure (int. dims. 47m N-S; 35.5m E-W), with an appreciable slope from the S end to the N end, bounded by the remains of a substantial earth and stone rampart with remains of a narrow fosse at its external foot and remains of a slight counterscarp bank of earth and stone. The inner bank is best preserved in the S end and E side where it rises well above the interior. Elsewhere, it rises but slightly above the interior but drops appreciably to the fosse. The inner bank has remains of both internal and external stone facing. The outer bank is very slight and fragmentary. A portion of the counterscarp has been quarried away on the ENE. A gap (Wth 6m) in the inner bank on the E side may represent the entrance. It is partly blocked by collapsed material. There is no definite trace of a causeway. There is no trace of an outer gap but the outer bank is much disturbed there. In the SW corner is s small square hut foundation (WM024-029001-) represented by a slight earth and stone bank’ (SMR File 20/07/1971) A second report from 1976 described the monument as following ; ‘The square shaped embankment is enclosed by an earth / stone bank. The bank has a stone facing in places best seen on the E and s sides. The crest is highest on the S and E and in places on the E inner stone facing can be seen. The bank is surrounded by a narrow fosse and a small outer bank which is barely discernible in places. A causewayed entrance feature exist in the centre of the E side. The fosse is deepest in the SE corner. The interior is free of scrub and slopes from S to N where the ridge on which the site is placed falls away. Limestone outcrop visible. Internal partition walls are visible in the NE corner. There is a small stone built square enclosure (a house site) (WM024-029001-) in the extreme SW corner with another possible house site conjoining it to the N. There are traces of a large stone wall running N from this structure. Situated on the N facing slopes with good view of pasture land to N. W and E’ (SMR File 23/04/1976). A later undated report described the monument as a ‘fairly large earthwork almost sub-rectangular in shape. The sides are gently curved & the corners are rounded. The earthwork is bounded by a bank of earth & stones. On the northern side the bank is set on a low counterscarp embankment. In several places the inner & outer faces of the bank have the remains of stone facing. Outside the bank there is a shallow fosse with a low outer bank of earth & stones outside it. There is no definite entrance to the interior. Part of the bank & fosse have been disturbed in the northern corner. In the interior there are a number of low banks. On the SW side & in the western corner there are 5 small enclosures, while in the eastern corner there is a larger enclosure. The significance of these enclosures is not very clear, some may be the remains of houses. The earthwork is on a gentle slope facing north & NE’ (SMR file). Compiled by: Caimin O’Brien Date of upload: 10 March 2016
- WM024-029001 House - indeterminate date
Description
Situated on N facing slope of rising ground with ringfort (WM024-028----) 125m to W. Possible house site located in SW corner of possible moated site (WM024-029----). A report from 1971 records that the monument consisted of ‘a large rectilinear enclosure (WM024-029----), with an appreciable slope from the S end to the N end, bounded by the remains of a substantial earth and stone rampart with remains of a narrow fosse at its external foot and remains of a slight counterscarp bank of earth and stone. A gap (Wth 6m) in the inner bank on the E side may represent the entrance. In the SW corner is s small square hut foundation represented by a slight earth and stone bank’ (SMR File 20/07/1971) A second report from 1976 described the monument as following ; ‘The square shaped embankment (WM024-029----) is enclosed by an earth / stone bank. A causewayed entrance feature exist in the centre of the E side. Internal partition walls are visible in the NE corner. There is a small stone built square enclosure (a house site) in the extreme SW corner with another possible house site conjoining it to the N. There are traces of a large stone wall running N from this structure. Situated on the N facing slopes with good view of pasture land to N. W and E’ (SMR File 23/04/1976). A later undated report described the monument as a ‘fairly large earthwork (WM024-029----) almost sub-rectangular in shape. In the interior there are a number of low banks. On the SW side & in the western corner there are 5 small enclosures, while in the eastern corner there is a larger enclosure. The significance of these enclosures is not very clear, some may be the remains of houses. The earthwork is on a gentle slope facing north & NE’ (SMR file). Compiled by: Caimin O’Brien Date of upload: 10 March 2016
And 36 more.
Architectural heritage
No building of the National Inventory of Architectural Heritage stands on this parcel.
Designated sites: National Parks and Wildlife Service. Recorded monuments: Sites and Monuments Record, National Monuments Service. Buildings: National Inventory of Architectural Heritage. Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage, CC BY 4.0. Works at or in relation to a recorded monument need two months' written notice to the National Monuments Service (National Monuments (Amendment) Act 1994, section 12).
Download this parcel: DXF, in Irish Transverse Mercator metres, with its neighbours and buildings, for a drawing program; GeoJSON, in WGS 84, for a map.
Registered freehold land, Tailte Éireann, CC BY 4.0. A parcel is the land of a title, not an address. The owner's name is in the Land Registry of Tailte Éireann: a copy of the folio can be ordered on landdirect.ie, for a fee.
- Area
- 37 ha
- 91 acres
- Land parcels
- 2
- registered freehold, median 184,957 m² (18.5 ha, 45.7 acres)
- Zoning
- —
- not in a zoned settlement
- Planning
- 0
- applications since 2010
Land parcels
Registered freehold land, Tailte Éireann
2 registered freehold parcels lie mostly in Mweelra, from 34,682 m² (3.47 ha, 8.57 acres) to 335,232 m² (33.52 ha, 82.84 acres). The dashed line is the townland's boundary; 9 neighbouring parcels touch it.
Zoning
Development plans, national zoning
No zone of a development plan covers Mweelra in the national zoning. Outside zoned towns and villages, the county development plan's rural policies apply to each application.
Source: Tailte Éireann and the Department of Housing (MyPlan), national zoning, CC BY 4.0.
Planning applications
Sites that touch the townland, newest first
No planning application touches the townland of Mweelra in the national file, which goes back to 2010.
Source: National Planning Applications, Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage, CC BY 4.0. Applicants are not shown.
Nature and heritage
Designated sites and recorded monuments
Designated sites
No designated site (Special Area of Conservation, Special Protection Area, Natural Heritage Area or proposed one) touches the townland of Mweelra.
Recorded monuments
- WM024-030 Barrow - stepped barrow
Description
Surveyed in 2013 and described by McGuinness (2014, 57) as following: 'Roughly circular earthwork (Diam. 41m N-S x 37m E-W) comprising a low, poorly defined circular mound or platform (Diam. 19.4m N-S x 18.2m E-W) surrounded by a lower, berm-like feature ranging in width (from base of inner mound to external ground level) from 9m on S side to 12.5m on N side, and up to 1.2m in height on W side; overall height of monument reaches up to 2.5m above ground level on W side. Inner mound rises up to 1.6m above berm on SE side, being much higher on S than on N side. Limestone boulders protrude from the monument at various places, a very large split one lying at the junction of berm and inner mound or platform on SE side. To SE of centre of monument is a tiny irregular mound, apparently limestone boulders covered by a thin layer of soil. Cutting 5m into SW edge of berm but extending beyond it is an oval stone-filled depression, about 7m in width at edge of berm; this appears to be of relatively recent origin (limekiln?). Monument has been identified as a ringfort in the RMP and as an ‘Earthwork’ by Schot (2006, Fig. 2), but seems better classified as a stepped barrow. Barrow lies on NE spur of Hill of Ushnagh, E of a point midway between mound-barrow in Mweelra (WM024-173----) to S and ringfort and associated mound in Togherstown (WM024-025----) to N. Immediately E of monument is a linear feature running NNE-SSW, which appears to comprise a grassed-over wall with what appears to be a gate (a huge block of stone forming one gatepost), but farther SSW this wall or bank appears to have been flattened and has the appearance of a low, linear causeway. This feature, which runs for many hundreds of metres to N of site, appears from aerial photograph on ASI website to end about 150m to S of barrow, possibly at a large oval enclosure. It is clear from this aerial photograph that the linear feature swerves slightly to E to avoid the barrow'. Compiled by: Caimin O'Brien based on details provided by David McGuinness. Date of upload: 23 February 2015
- WM024-064002 Ritual site - pond
Description
Lough Lugh is a small lake located in a slight hollow (166m above sea-level) between the western and eastern summits of Uisneach, at the approximate centre of the monument complex (WM024-177----). The lake has been identified as Loch Lugborta where, according to early Irish tradition, the god Lug was drowned by the mythical trio, Mac Cuill, Mac Cecht and Mac Greine and subsequently buried in a cairn nearby (Schot 2011; Schot 2010, 5; Gwynn 1924, 278-81). The lake measures c.80m N/S by 60m E/W and has a floating vegetation mat at its centre. Its associated mythology and comparison with similar bodies of water at other royal centres, such as within the Navan Complex, Co. Armagh, suggest that the lake might have been a ritual focus in prehistory. Recent palaeoenvironmental investigations, involving a study of the lake sediments and the fossilised remains of insects and pollen, have shown that the lake has an interesting and complex history (Schot et al. 2014; McGinley et al. 2015). A lake was present here at the end of the last ice age, some 12,000 years ago, but it began to develop into a marsh before 8,000BC. Sometime later, possibly in the late prehistoric or early medieval period, the accumulated sediments were dug out to restore open water conditions. The existing lake, therefore, is the combined result of natural processes and human endeavour and may have been created as a ritual pond and/or as a watering hole for livestock (ibid.). See attached photo (WM024-064002-_01) provided by Dr. Roseanne Schot Compiled by: Dr. Roseanne Schot Date of upload: 08 May 2019
- WM024-173 Barrow - mound barrow
Description
Surveyed in 2013 and described by McGuinness (2014, 56) as following: 'Sharply defined circular tumulus (Diam. 15.5m N-S x 15.6m E-W) with irregular stony cap containing protruding boulders close to ESE side. Mound rises up to 2m in height above surrounding ground on NW side, its stony cap being up to 0.51m in height. Protruding boulders are visible at various points around the edge of the mound, with a row of them on the S side; it is unclear whether these are natural or form part of a kerb. On NE side of mound is a low, subrectangular projection (L. 3.5m; W. 3m) with boulders along its E side. A second low projection on W side might represent spill from mound. This mound appears to have been shaped from a natural landform. Tumulus was excavated by Macalister and Praeger after hearing a story that it ‘had been violated in comparatively recent times, and that a cist had been found within it’; they ‘trenched through the mound’ but ‘no evidence was found by us to shew that such a structure had ever existed’. The only feature they noted, aside from a rusty iron hook just under the sod and a broken quartzite pebble close to NNE edge of mound, was as follows: At one place within and near the top of the mound the stones seemed to have been laid intentionally, in an arc 25’ [c. 7.6m] in diameter, surrounding the centre; but nothing was found within it. No account of the excavation was provided, so it is unclear where their trench was dug or whether they accurately reconstructed the monument afterwards. Geophysical prospection by Roseanne Schot in 2005 and 2009, indicates that an arc of ditch surviving to N of the barrow originally formed part of an enormous hilltop enclosure (WM024-187----), defined by a rock-cut ditch and containing the barrow, which encircled the eastern summit of the Hill of Ushnagh (Schot 2010, 6). 4m-wide gap in enclosure at ENE, defined by the inwardly curved ends of the ditch, indicates an entrance aligned on the centrally positioned barrow. Barrow lies near E end of broad summit of Hill of Ushnagh, directly N of the conjoined, figure-of-eight-shaped early medieval fort excavated by Macalister and Praeger, and precisely on a line that takes in part of the ancient avenue approaching this fort from the S and continues on to the Togherstown ringfort and tumulus at the north end of the Uisneach complex. There is a small, shallow pond 21m to N; farther N again is a larger kettle-hole lake, beyond which is another barrow (WM024-030----). Frewin Hill (WM011-131----) and Knockdrin (WM012-032----), sites of hilltop barrows (McGuinness 2012, 28, 34-5), are visible to NE and ENE respectively'. In 2009 a geophysical survey was undertaken in the field enclosing the mound barrow and the results were described as following; 'A prominent mound (WM024-173----), 1.7m high and about 20m in diameter, crowns the summit of the hill and is probably the monument identified in Dindshenchas as Carn Lugdach or the Sidan, where the god Lugh is said to have been buried after being drowned in the nearby lake (Schot, forthcoming; Gwynn 1924, 278-9). The reported discovery of a cist within the mound sometime prior to the 1920s (Macalister and Praeger 1928, 83) suggests that this may be a bowl-barrow of early Bronze Age date. Magnetic gradiometry survey conducted around the mound in 2005 revealed a host of previously unrecorded archaeological features, including a curvilinear feature that was suspected to form part of a large enclosure encircling the eastern summit of the hill (Schot 2005). Evidenced as an arc-shaped, positive magnetic band curving from north to southeast across the western part of the surveyed area, this feature corresponds with a broad, shallow depression skirting the edge of the elevated plateau overlooking Lough Lugh (WM024-064002-), to the east, but exhibits no obvious surface trace elsewhere. Nevertheless, its geophysical and topographical signature suggested it to be an in-filled ditch, and the survey in Area 2 was undertaken to ascertain the extent and potential significance of this feature and to broaden the investigation of the eastern summit. Area 2 comprises an L-shaped extension to the area investigated in 2005, and encompasses lands of approximately 1.3ha, with maximum dimensions 170m east-west by 140m north-south' (Schot 2010, 6). Compiled and revised by: Caimin O'Brien based on details provided by David McGuinness and Dr. Roseanne Schot Date of revised upload: 09 May 2019
- WM024-187 Hilltop enclosure
Description
The largest monument at Uisneach, this enclosure is defined by a curvilinear ditch measuring nearly 200m in diameter and straddles three adjoining townlands on the E summit of the Hill (Schot 2010, 8-9; Schot 2011). A prominent mound (WM024-173---) crowns the gently rounded rise at the centre of the enclosure, while on the SW the enclosure overlooks Lough Lugh (WM024-064002-), which lies c.50m downslope. The SW sector of the enclosure was first recorded by geophysical survey in 2005 and a segment of its silted-up ditch can still be traced as a broad, shallow depression curving from NNW to SE near Lough Lugh. Further survey in 2009 revealed the full extent of the enclosure, which is sub-circular in plan (ibid., 103–4). The NW sector of the enclosure and portions of its S perimeter underlie, and are now obscured by, the townland boundary walls that divide Mweelra from Ushnagh Hill and Rathnew, respectively. For most of its circuit, however, the enclosure is evidenced geophysically as a curvilinear band of positive magnetic gradient, 2m in average width. Although the ditch appears to have been relatively substantial, and may be rock-cut, no traces of an accompanying bank have been identified. The magnetic signature of the enclosure on the E and SE is notably weaker than elsewhere along its circuit, probably as a result of extensive ploughing in this area in recent centuries. Notwithstanding this disturbance, the entrance to the enclosure is clearly discernible on the NE, and comprises a gap, c.4m wide, defined on the N by a distinctive, inward-curving terminal. Several other, narrower, breaches are also apparent elsewhere in the line of the enclosure; however it is uncertain whether these are deliberate features. They may, for example, be the result of later disturbance or could simply reflect the presence of different (non-magnetic) fills in the ditch. Some half a dozen pit-type features, 1-2m in diameter, were recorded at various points along the line of the enclosure and may mark the location of post-pits or deposits placed in the ditch. In addition to the mound (WM024-173---) at its centre, several ring-ditches and a large number of pits were recorded by geophysical survey inside and surrounding the enclosure, as were a range of other potentially significant, but less clearly defined, features. Comparison with the large-scale ceremonial enclosures at other prehistoric assembly places, including the royal centres of Tara, Navan Fort and Rathcroghan, suggests a late prehistoric (possibly Iron Age) date for this hilltop enclosure (ibid., 104). Compiled by: Dr. Roseanne Schot Date of upload: 08 May 2019
- WM024-197 Ring-ditch
Description
This small ring-ditch was recorded by geophysical survey c.20m NE of the hilltop enclosure (WM024-187----) in 2009 (Schot 2009; 2011). The ditch is defined by a discontinuous circular band of positive magnetic values, c.1m in maximum width and 7m in diameter, with several pit-type anomalies along its circuit. A large pit-type feature lies at the centre of the enclosed area and other possible pits varying from 1m to 2.5m in diameter surround the ring-ditch on the W, E and S. Traces of another possible ring-ditch were recorded c.6m to the S. Compiled by: Dr. Roseanne Schot Date of upload: 08 May 2019
- WM024-198 Ring-ditch
Description
Identified by geophysical survey in 2005, this ring-ditch is located on a low rise in the western sector of the hilltop enclosure (WM024-187----), approximately 65m SW of the mound (WM024-173---) (Schot 2005; 2011). It is evidenced as a semi-circular band of positive magnetic values, extending clockwise from N to SE, and has a projected diameter of c.9m. A possible pit lies at the centre of the ring-ditch, which is flanked on the N by an area of strong magnetic responses and several ill-defined linear and curvilinear features which are likely to be of archaeological origin. Compiled by: Dr. Roseanne Schot Date of upload: 08 May 2019
- WM024-199 Ring-ditch
Description
This small, sub-circular enclosure was identified by geophysical survey in 2005 and appears to be a partly ploughed-out ring-ditch (Schot 2005; 2011). Located in the SW quadrant of the hilltop enclosure (WM024-187----), c.70m SW of the mound (WM024-173----), it is defined by fragmented linear and pit-type responses and measures c.8.5m in maximum diameter. Compiled by: Dr. Roseanne Schot Date of upload: 08 May 2019
Architectural heritage
No building of the National Inventory of Architectural Heritage stands in the townland of Mweelra.
Designated sites: National Parks and Wildlife Service. Recorded monuments: Sites and Monuments Record, National Monuments Service. Buildings: National Inventory of Architectural Heritage. Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage, CC BY 4.0. Works at or in relation to a recorded monument need two months' written notice to the National Monuments Service (National Monuments (Amendment) Act 1994, section 12).
Homes sold
Property Price Register
No address of the register names Mweelra with five sales or more. The sales of the area are on the page of Co. Westmeath.
The townland
- Name
- Mweelra
- Area
- 369,915 m² (36.99 ha, 91.41 acres)
- Civil parish
- Conry, and its townlands
- Barony
- Rathconrath
- Electoral division
- Ballymorin, the unit of the census
- Neighbouring townlands
- Rathnew, Togherstown, Ushnagh Hill
- Placenames
- Mweelra on logainm.ie, the Placenames Database of Ireland
Townlands, civil parishes, baronies and electoral divisions, National Statutory Boundaries, Tailte Éireann, CC BY 4.0. A townland is the smallest land division of Ireland, and the unit of a rural address; old registers such as the 1901 and 1911 censuses file it under its civil parish and barony.